What I don’t understand is, you achieved your unique class archetype and done so well. I honestly feel they could do a lot better if they started over with the numeric values from the ground up. Their problem is there are so many variables they aren’t able to level off the disparity. So in a way no matter what nerfs or buffs you implement, provided you can maintain the attention of the skilled (intelligent in this example given) player, they’ll find the next thing for you to consider making adjustments on. Skill will always imbalance an otherwise level playing field. You’ll please nobody and upset many dedicated fans simultaneously. These polar extremities beget a spectrum that can’t be met in the middle.
Sort of like trying to facilitate a happy medium dead smack in the middle of extreme polarities. Trying to regulate the disparity that advantageous intelligence manifests is a doomed endeavor. A competitive player that condones p2w is no different than a competitive player that is willing to use cheats to win.īut those group versus group pvp fights surely have appeal. Am I saying that people that endorse p2w aren’t competitive? Not at all. I’ve never even played D:I (p2w is a turn off for most competitive players). If they brought D:I’s pvp model to D4 I’d play again. The only competition in D4 revolves around time sinking or is non-existent. It also says that competition drives longevity and success in a game. It declares that the console & mobile market are gaining traction while the PC market is starting to dwindle.
0 kommentar(er)
